← ClinicoQ
European Hernia Society (EHS) / Americas Hernia Society (AHS) · 2020

Umbilical & Epigastric Hernia — Watchful Waiting vs. Repair, Technique Selection

Source: Guidelines for treatment of umbilical and epigastric hernias from the European Hernia Society and Americas Hernia Society, British Journal of Surgery, 2020
Guideline: Strong Guideline: Conditional Guideline: Not recommended ClinicoQ pathway suggestion (not from the cited guideline)

Diagnosis

Diagnostic criteria A primary hernia with its center at the umbilicus (umbilical) or close to the midline above the umbilicus (epigastric), presenting as a bulge with or without pain/discomfort. Defect size (maximum transverse diameter) is classified as small (<1 cm), medium (1–4 cm), or large (>4 cm) per the EHS/AHS classification, which guides treatment strategy.
⚠ Alarm features (investigate before diagnosing)
Initial workup
TestWhen to order
Physical examination Sufficient for diagnosis and sizing in most patients; imaging is not routinely required.
Ultrasound or CT Large hernias, potential loss of domain, obesity, unclear defect size, or suspicion of additional defects — to plan the surgical approach.

Decision Points

❓ Is the umbilical/epigastric hernia symptomatic?
No — asymptomatic Watchful waiting
Yes — symptomatic (pain, discomfort, or enlarging) Elective repair
❓ What is the defect size?
Small (<1 cm) Suture repair may be considered (selected small defects)
Medium-large (≥1 cm) Mesh repair
❓ Is the patient at higher risk of wound complications (obesity, smoking) or does the defect require a larger mesh?
No — standard risk, small-medium defect Open repair with preperitoneal flat mesh
Yes — higher wound-complication risk or larger defect Laparoscopic repair

Treatment

Watchful waiting

1 Watchful waiting with patient counseling Weak/Conditional (Guideline recommendation) — appears safe based on available data
Dose
Duration
Ongoing; reassess if symptoms develop
Evidence level
Low (limited outcome data)
Avoid if
Signs of incarceration/strangulation
If no response ClinicoQ pathway
Approximately 20% of watchfully-waited patients eventually proceed to surgery as symptoms develop

Suture repair may be considered (selected small defects)

1 Primary suture repair (no mesh) Conditional (Guideline recommendation) — may be considered for small defects, though mesh reduces recurrence even in this group
Dose
— surgical procedure
Duration
Elective
Evidence level
Low-Moderate
Avoid if
Defect ≥1 cm (mesh preferred)
If no response

Open repair with preperitoneal flat mesh

1 Open repair with a flat mesh placed in the preperitoneal space Strong (Guideline recommendation) — recommended approach for symptomatic umbilical/epigastric hernias
Dose
— surgical procedure
Duration
Elective
Evidence level
Moderate
Avoid if
Active wound infection at the surgical site
If no response

Laparoscopic repair

1 Laparoscopic mesh repair Conditional (Guideline recommendation) — reserved for larger defects and patients at higher risk of wound complications, where it lowers wound complication rates versus open repair
Dose
— surgical procedure
Duration
Elective
Evidence level
Low-Moderate
Avoid if
Small, uncomplicated defect in a standard-risk patient (open repair is simpler and equally effective there)
If no response

✕ Treatments the guideline advises against

Watchful waiting for a hernia with signs of incarceration or strangulation: This is a surgical emergency; watchful waiting only applies to genuinely asymptomatic hernias.
⚠️ This is an educational summary of current international clinical practice guidelines and does not replace individualized clinical judgment. Final treatment decisions remain the responsibility of the treating physician.