Renal Colic (Urolithiasis) — Management Guideline
Source: EAU Guidelines on Urolithiasis, European Association of Urology, 2026 edition
Guideline: Strong
Guideline: Conditional
Guideline: Not recommended
ClinicoQ pathway suggestion (not from the cited guideline)
Diagnosis
Diagnostic criteria
Suspected based on acute flank pain radiating to the groin, often with nausea/vomiting and hematuria; confirmed by imaging showing a ureteral or renal stone. Non-contrast CT is the gold standard for diagnosing acute flank pain and has replaced intravenous urography.
⚠ Alarm features (investigate before diagnosing)
- Fever or signs of infection (an obstructed, infected kidney is a urological emergency)
- Solitary or transplanted kidney with obstruction
- Bilateral obstruction or anuria
- Uncontrolled pain despite analgesia
- Significant deterioration in renal function
Initial workup
| Test | When to order |
|---|---|
| Ultrasound | Primary diagnostic imaging tool (avoids radiation); pain relief or any other emergency measure should not be delayed by imaging. |
| Immediate imaging | Indicated with fever or a solitary kidney, and when the diagnosis is uncertain. |
| Non-contrast CT | To confirm the stone diagnosis in patients with acute flank pain following the initial ultrasound assessment. |
| Urine dipstick (red cells, white cells, nitrites, pH) with microscopy and/or culture | In emergency stone patients; obtain a urine culture or microscopy before any treatment is planned. |
| Serum creatinine, uric acid, ionised calcium, sodium, potassium, blood count, and CRP | In emergency stone patients; the metabolic risk evaluation follows after the acute episode. |
| Coagulation tests (PTT and INR) | If an intervention is likely or planned. |
| Imaging in pregnancy | Ultrasound is preferred; MRI is second-line, and low-dose CT is a last-line option. |
✕ Tests the guideline advises against
Kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) urography when non-contrast CT is being considered: EAU states that KUB should not be performed if non-contrast CT is being considered.
Treatment
Acute pain management
1
NSAID (e.g., diclofenac; ibuprofen or metamizole are alternatives)
Strong (Guideline recommendation) — first drug of choice, depending on cardiovascular risk factors and side effects
- Dose
- Diclofenac sodium 100-150 mg/day (oral or suppository, in divided doses); IM dosing may be used for immediate acute pain relief in the emergency setting
- Duration
- As needed for the acute episode; 3-10 days for stones expected to pass spontaneously
- Evidence level
- High
- Avoid if
- Significant renal impairment, active GI bleeding, cardiovascular disease (diclofenac only after careful consideration in patients with significant cardiovascular risk factors)
- If no response ClinicoQ pathway
- Add an opioid if pain remains uncontrolled; avoid pethidine specifically if an opioid is needed
2
Paracetamol
Guideline-supported option — effective in acute stone colic, with NSAIDs preferred as first drug of choice
- Dose
- Per product labeling
- Duration
- As needed for the acute episode
- Evidence level
- Moderate
- Avoid if
- Liver disease; known hypersensitivity
- If no response ClinicoQ pathway
- Add or switch to an NSAID if not contraindicated, or to an opioid
3
Opioid (hydromorphone, pentazocine, or tramadol) or ketamine, as a second choice
Weak (Guideline recommendation) — second choice after NSAIDs
- Dose
- Per product labeling
- Duration
- Short-term, in the acute setting
- Evidence level
- Low
- Avoid if
- Pethidine: guideline advises against it as the opioid (high rate of vomiting and more further analgesia needed)
- If no response
- Renal decompression (stent or percutaneous nephrostomy) or ureteroscopic stone removal for analgesia-refractory colic
Facilitating stone passage (observation and medical expulsive therapy)
1
Observation with periodic evaluation
Strong (Guideline recommendation) — for newly diagnosed small ureteral stones when active removal is not indicated and the patient is informed
- Dose
- —
- Duration
- Until passage, or until a complication or an indication for removal arises
- Evidence level
- Moderate
- Avoid if
- Infection, refractory pain, or deterioration of renal function
- If no response ClinicoQ pathway
- Offer an alpha-blocker as medical expulsive therapy for distal ureteral stones larger than 5 mm
2
Alpha-blocker as medical expulsive therapy (e.g., tamsulosin), off-label
Strong (Guideline recommendation, 2026) — one of the treatment options for distal ureteral stones larger than 5 mm; off-label indication
- Dose
- e.g., tamsulosin 0.4 mg once daily
- Duration
- Until stone passage or until active treatment is chosen
- Evidence level
- Conflicting overall (some advantage for distal ureteral stones larger than 5 mm)
- Avoid if
- Symptomatic hypotension; known hypersensitivity
- If no response
- Active stone removal if pain persists despite analgesia, obstruction persists, renal function is impaired, or spontaneous passage is unlikely
Obstructed infected kidney / anuria (urological emergency)
1
Urgent decompression of the collecting system (percutaneous drainage or ureteral stenting)
Strong (Guideline recommendation) — in sepsis with an obstructing stone
- Dose
- —
- Duration
- Urgent
- Evidence level
- High
- Avoid if
- —
- If no response
- Start antibiotics immediately (with intensive care if necessary), collect urine for antibiogram after decompression, re-evaluate the antibiotic regimen, and delay definitive stone treatment until sepsis is resolved
Active stone removal for ureteral stones (when indicated)
1
Ureteral stone larger than 10 mm: ureteroscopy first-line, shock wave lithotripsy second
Strong (Guideline recommendation) — indications: low likelihood of spontaneous passage, persistent pain despite analgesia, persistent obstruction, or renal insufficiency. Inform patients that ureteroscopy more often achieves stone-free status in a single procedure but has higher complication rates than shock wave lithotripsy; use ureteroscopy first-line in morbid obesity
- Dose
- —
- Duration
- Elective, after sepsis and infection are excluded or treated
- Evidence level
- High
- Avoid if
- Untreated urinary tract infection; shock wave lithotripsy is contraindicated in pregnancy, uncorrected bleeding disorders, and distal anatomical obstruction
2
Ureteral stone smaller than 10 mm: shock wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy
Guideline treatment algorithm (EAU, proximal and distal ureteral stones)
- Dose
- —
- Duration
- Elective
- Evidence level
- High
- Avoid if
- Same as above
Pregnancy
1
Conservative management of uncomplicated stones
Strong (Guideline recommendation)
- Dose
- —
- Duration
- Until passage, unless a clinical indication for intervention arises
- Evidence level
- Moderate
- Avoid if
- —
- If no response
- If intervention is needed, ureteral stent or percutaneous nephrostomy are the readily available primary options; ureteroscopy is a reasonable alternative to avoid long-term drainage
✕ Treatments the guideline advises against
Pethidine (as the opioid of choice): If an opioid is needed, EAU recommends that it not be pethidine — it is associated with a high rate of vomiting compared with NSAIDs and a greater likelihood of further analgesia being needed.
Definitive stone treatment while sepsis from an obstructing stone is unresolved: EAU strongly recommends decompressing first and delaying definitive stone treatment until sepsis is resolved.
Routine antibiotic prophylaxis before shock wave lithotripsy in patients with sterile urine: EAU strongly recommends against it; prescribe prophylaxis only for suspected or diagnosed infected stones or bacteriuria.
Routine ureteral stent after uncomplicated ureteroscopy: EAU strongly recommends not inserting a stent in uncomplicated cases.
⚠️ This is an educational summary of current international clinical practice guidelines and does not replace individualized clinical judgment. Final treatment decisions remain the responsibility of the treating physician.